Home
Latest images
Search
Register
Log in
AdminAdmin- Posts : 35
Join date : 2018-01-15 
Losing money for China's high-speed railway is really ignorance
Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:51 pm
BBS unknown space station (Sun Jan 14 11:15:25 2018, the United States East)
European public transport is good. Do you know that all the bus lines, subways and trains are losing money?
Public transport itself is a part of social welfare and belongs to the taxpayer's right. Generally speaking, for buses and buses In developed cities, the cost of public operations is far less than having a private car for every household.
The United States has no such public welfare at all and the per-capita monthly commuting costs are much higher than those of other developed countries. this is nothing Proud of it.
Beijing-Shanghai railway itself is a miracle of profitability, even if the loss of money, but also belong to the welfare of taxpayers. U.S. politics House itself refused to improve the infrastructure, so that part of the cost to the ordinary people to bear, there is worth blowing? Some people really Clueless terrible
------------------- * ------------------------
Since the 1980s, China Railway has not done any trade at a loss, but it has been subsidizing passenger transport by freight since the 1990s.
High-speed rail needs to achieve overall profitability in order to reflect its value, but the long-term small individual lines no problem, most of the lines open Initial loss of about 5 years is also normal. If the long-term overall loss, by country or freight pay, the economy is not Lee's.
Now it seems that there have basically been no problems with the line profit that has been activated for 5 years. Western individual line planning does have some problems
Opened five years, or just started the line, it is possible to bring the entire high-speed rail network financial burden. But just do not Add such lines, this loss can afford.
European public transport is good. Do you know that all the bus lines, subways and trains are losing money?
Public transport itself is a part of social welfare and belongs to the taxpayer's right. Generally speaking, for buses and buses In developed cities, the cost of public operations is far less than having a private car for every household.
The United States has no such public welfare at all and the per-capita monthly commuting costs are much higher than those of other developed countries. this is nothing Proud of it.
Beijing-Shanghai railway itself is a miracle of profitability, even if the loss of money, but also belong to the welfare of taxpayers. U.S. politics House itself refused to improve the infrastructure, so that part of the cost to the ordinary people to bear, there is worth blowing? Some people really Clueless terrible
------------------- * ------------------------
Since the 1980s, China Railway has not done any trade at a loss, but it has been subsidizing passenger transport by freight since the 1990s.
High-speed rail needs to achieve overall profitability in order to reflect its value, but the long-term small individual lines no problem, most of the lines open Initial loss of about 5 years is also normal. If the long-term overall loss, by country or freight pay, the economy is not Lee's.
Now it seems that there have basically been no problems with the line profit that has been activated for 5 years. Western individual line planning does have some problems
Opened five years, or just started the line, it is possible to bring the entire high-speed rail network financial burden. But just do not Add such lines, this loss can afford.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|